- The Los Angeles Times in its coverage of Wal-mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, Betty, et al., 10-277, ”Supreme Court hears arguments in Wal-Mart sex discrimination case,” calls the Supreme Court “skeptical.”
- Meanwhile, The New York Times in its story, “Justices Take Up Class-Action Issue in Wal-Mart Bias Suit,” says the Supreme Court “appeared closely divided on Tuesday during arguments over the theory put forth by the plaintiffs.”
- Bloomberg sees an emerging gender gap on the Supreme Court bench, “Wal-Mart Discrimination Case Reveals Gender Gap at High Court.”
March 31st, 2011 | 
Author: 
Posted in Class Action, Focused REWIND, Labor & Employment, Litigation, REWIND | 
Tags: arguments, bias, class action, Dukes, gender, gender discrimination, Supreme Court, Wal-mart, women